Web32 – I concur with Advocate General Kokott where, in the Opinion delivered on 14 December 2006 in Case C‐142/05 Mickelsson and Roos (not yet published in the ECR), footnote 31, she interprets the concept of an obstacle to market access broadly to include not only measures that ‘prevent’ but also those that ‘significantly impede ... WebApr 28, 2009 · goods after the rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos’ (2009) 34 Eu-ropean Law Review 914, 915ff. See further: Case C-442/02 Caixa-Bank France v Mi-

CURIA - List of results

WebRev. 926 On the other hand, consider the caveats imposed in Mickelsson and Roos: there, the Court accepted that restricting the use of personal watercrafts was a legitimate policy … WebJan 2, 2009 · Percy Mickelsson and Joakim Roos , Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2009; Case C-265/06, Commission v. Portugal , Judgment of the … troy sessions

EUR-Lex - 62005CC0142 - EN - EUR-Lex - Europa

WebThe European Court of Justice's (ECJ's) judgments in Moped Trailers 1 and in Mickelsson & Roos 2 concern a type of national measure that the Court had so far had few opportunities to assess under ... WebSep 28, 2024 · In a criminal case concerning a violation of the prohibition against sailing outside such general navigable waterways, the defendants, Mickelsson and Roos, argued that Swedish law was contrary to Article (now) 34, as the prohibition greatly reduced potential consumers’ interest in buying personal watercrafts. WebJan 1, 2010 · Moped Trailers, Mickelsson & Roos, Gysbrechts : The ECJ’s Case Law on Goods Keeps on Moving Stefan Enchelmaier I. Introduction Th e European Court of Justice’s (ECJ’s) judgments in Moped Trailers¹ and in Mickelsson & Roos² concern a type of national measure that the Court had so far had few opportunities to assess under Article 34 TFEU:³ … troy series netflix